[(beta)]
…
First:
(there is)
Secondariness
…
That,
“From the first”
– we are, things are, – in medias-res.
(already)
…
Notice (then), the shape of (this) multiplicity … ?
- not just, the momentousness of every-present, vanishing into itself
- or, ‘our bursting universe’,
- but also, the ephemeral body of time motioning the valance of its infinity
- right as it echos itself without the Image of the what which was reflected back
…
The “why” was within them
The question, – carries it across
…
Like:
“What am we”
“What part, what puzzle”
“Am this”
…
[{That there is only one-thing: and (that) it is not itself.}]
…
[[ And for we who live in and off the world… ?
Every thought is hollow.
Every “thing” – something else.
Everyone: another. ]]
…
“That the All
is nothing but a difference to itself…
…
In itself, for itself, –
the Other that it is
(as) Becoming
eternally (the) Same
forever
without success
/ ?
…
Well… the polydot here ends, somewhat arbitrarily, – by writing itself off as one in a series of ‘successful failures’
– wholly be they in error, – in\as\and through the non-centre of things:
O
And yet, all this, in partial-demonstration of “its point”. Its “very point” –
– that ‘things become’, only by their very inability to identify ‘is’ with ‘is’
Ø
…
This post has tentatively received the Amecylia dot com stamp of approval.
